xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery
>From: Tristan Gingold
>Sent: 2006年3月9日 21:01
>> >
>> > Ok.
>> > Maybe it can be more easily done in Xen ?
>>
>> Sorry, I'm new to Xen. So I don't know.
>SImply because Xen is smaller and the Xen community is smaller too, and
>because Fujitsu is already a member of this community. Also since Xen/ia64
>is not that stable, it is also easier to accept not thouroughly tested
>patches.
>
>Tristan.
>
I'm not against this specific case of interrupt domains, and also not
against experiment on that if helps. However I disagrees your last
sentence.
Adding immature code into unstable base only makes things messed,
worse, and more error-prone. Together with people's on-going effort to
make xen/ia64 more stable, new patches should be more careful to
address existing issues that people are concern.
(Recent clean-up patches on the list are highly appreciated,
including yours :-)
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, (continued)
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Tian, Kevin
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Tian, Kevin
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Tian, Kevin
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery,
Tian, Kevin <=
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Tian, Kevin
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vIOSAPIC and IRQs delivery, Tian, Kevin
|
|
|