Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] xen 4.4 FC3 xl create error

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 18:41 +0000, M A Young wrote:
> > We should probably consider taking some unit files into the xen tree, if
> > someone wants to submit a set?
> 
> I can submit a set, which start services individually rather than a 
> unified xencommons style start file. I didn't find a good way to reproduce 
> the xendomains script, so I ended running an edited version of the 
> sysvinit script with a systemd wrapper file.

I don't know what is conventional in systemd land but I have no problem
with that approach.

> Would it make sense to have some sort of configure option tools to choose 
> between sysvinit and systemd?

AIUI systemd will DTWT and ignore the initscript if there is a systemd
unit file, so installing both seems to be fine to me, and is certain to
be less error prone.

Although perhaps the xencommons vs split units breaks that suppression
logic?

What depends on the xenstored & xenconsole modules? Is it possible to
have a "metaunit" xencommons which a) causes everything to be started
and b) suppresses the initscript by having the same name?

Or maybe there is a systemd syntax you can use to suppress
xencommons.init?

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel