This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Marcin Kuk <marcin.kuk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:48:00 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:49:13 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bcRNK6i0+kbzJmR0FckW5x2nsOODVhkHdwz/Rgij7Po=; b=giNSpJNx16nxWBBf6lUkxDCQgxlKblWZp0u7buaptjyge7UuO53ACVQplc6ULF56Mk JE29OfsmZqJ9MeCMimVNei9tkEuXLFmRDWI11E699jGnfK01mqrP6g2Zpl0lgcyxvoSU zi+Hauy/TJlW6jlar2qsmd2ojTHKZeI03l/hc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=upLxH1Fpy1HEtaseM4937y6HqgDlDTE5TCIOHEWfamYa5h/to4UTPUOmgz4FNbEVLh kmJikky0XmCGslqdr+/O+omy/RAWXhN1Wt2nBevCO0U/FElWvcYZqWnbBHOQT7rApGGa JPmKzeTMMhKskqwN31cEWu428+8EVMmcwAlzk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110127161313.GI29664@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FF9BC.40601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.4007da378a.AANLkTiku=-RhcyUZVHmwnJ18+Az6Fk5CxdEjKdHQKJ54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.500762e9ba.AANLkTimBCeps+-ga4-WDpjb352Uoo_YMe4KjXbAyaRbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127161313.GI29664@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2011/1/27 Adi Kriegisch <adi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi!
>> > to increase performances you can skip iscsi and you can try a SAS SAN
>> > (with some LSI SAS switch if you need more than 4 servers linked to a
>> > single SAN)
>> Do you get different types of SAN? SAN = iSCSI, last time I checked.
> from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_area_network:
>  Most storage networks use the SCSI protocol for communication between
>  servers and disk drive devices. A mapping layer to other protocols is used
>  to form a network:
>    * ATA over Ethernet (AoE), mapping of ATA over Ethernet
>    * Fibre Channel Protocol (FCP), the most prominent one, is a mapping of
>    * SCSI over Fibre Channel
>    * Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)
>    * ESCON over Fibre Channel (FICON), used by mainframe computers
>    * HyperSCSI, mapping of SCSI over Ethernet
>    * iFCP[2] or SANoIP[3] mapping of FCP over IP
>    * iSCSI, mapping of SCSI over TCP/IP
>    * iSCSI Extensions for RDMA (iSER), mapping of iSCSI over InfiniBand
>  Storage networks may also be built using SAS and SATA technologies. SAS
>  evolved from SCSI direct-attached storage. SATA evolved from IDE
>  direct-attached storage. SAS and SATA devices can be networked using SAS
>  Expanders.
> So SAN = iSCSI isn't quite it.

Never ending story...
This is only terminology - you can talk about it all the time, but the
question is... who cares? ;) Any of you will win - all this is named
by people, and tomorow all can have different meanings.

Marcin Kuk

Xen-users mailing list