This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

To: Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:50:02 +0200
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:52:51 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=softdux.com; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-Assp-ID:X-Assp-Version:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=GoBlr1gygyM30rVXyMsqfXMw9msNXa5LQ/ce2ZP/IJ2OP0ELTy6diMDZQmUxxQUB0QDh2T+1WHHTdMCX+Pi4kZRiCUqiqPLIoO1g5g7KW0nHdgZePwmtviZWR1sEXgio;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FF9BC.40601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.4007da378a.AANLkTiku=-RhcyUZVHmwnJ18+Az6Fk5CxdEjKdHQKJ54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Il 26/01/2011 11:44, Rudi Ahlers ha scritto:
> [cut]
>> So, what other options do we have, which is not slow?
> to increase performances you can skip iscsi and you can try a SAS SAN
> (with some LSI SAS switch if you need more than 4 servers linked to a
> single SAN)

Do you get different types of SAN? SAN = iSCSI, last time I checked.

> actually you can have a large amount of power inside a server chassis so
> ...the problem is only I/O and sometimes one storage cannot handle more
> than 2/3 servers
> [cut]
>> But this soon becomes very expensive, often beyond the point of making
>> a decent profit out of the setup without charging the clients so much
>> that they'll rather go elsewhere. And in many cases it means new NAS
>> and SAN equipment as well since not all of them support infiniband
> infiniband is not so expensive ...if you move ~ all to infiniband is
> very cost effective but you have to invest a large amount of time.

It depends where you are, in our country it's exuberantly expensive.

> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

Xen-users mailing list