|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Adi Kriegisch <adi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> What do you then do if you want redundancy, between 2 client PC's, i.e
>> similar to RAID1 ?
> Oh well, there are several ways to achieve this, I guess:
> * use dm mirroring on top of clvm (I tested this once personally but did
> not need it for production then -- will probably look into it some time
> again).
> I think this is just the way to go although it might be a little slower
> than running a raid in domU.
> * Giving two LVs to the virtual machines and let them do the mirroring with
> software raid.
> I think this option offers greatest performance while being robust. The
> only disadvantage I see is that in case of failure you have to recreate
> all the software raids in your domUs. In some hosting environments this
> might be an issue.
Why not just give the 2 LV's to the dom0, and raid it on the dom0
instead? The the domU's still use the "local storage" as before and
they won't know about it.
> * Use glusterfs/drbd/... Performancewise and in terms of reliability and
> stability I do not see any issues here. But to use those you actually do
> not need a SAN as a backend. A SAN always adds a performance penalty due
> to an increase of latency. Local storage always has an advantage over SAN
> in this respect. So in case you plan to use glusterfs, drbd or something
> like that, you should reconsider the SAN issue. This might save alot of
> money as well... ;-)
I would prefer not to use DRBD. Every layer you add, adds more
complication at the end of the day.
And we already have this expensive EMC SAN, so I would like to utilize
it somehow, but with better redundancy.
>
> -- Adi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
- Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Adi Kriegisch
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Rudi Ahlers
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Adi Kriegisch
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs,
Rudi Ahlers <=
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Pierre
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Adi Kriegisch
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Rudi Ahlers
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Pierre
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Adi Kriegisch
- Message not available
- Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christian Zoffoli
- Re:Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, yue
|
|
|
|
|