Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

To:	Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From:	Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:13:34 +0200
Cc:	"xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pierre <pierre@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:14:58 -0800
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=softdux.com; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-Assp-ID:X-Assp-Version:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=VRTJLuvXcSAYglfDAORaTv8YAv0lYo9WMVn1sSXZq0TBB60kZdntZ41vUBIbJWdPWAdLHP6IXrzQ9XRJU8Vkg4nXYFxT9wridVMNGvW18pBTzijbtACUmp/jGs03xkq3;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4D416C6B.9080204@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<AANLkTin+K5G10_03qLRT_yqCRELu339roLEHy1bVFoqR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FF9BC.40601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.4007da378a.AANLkTiku=-RhcyUZVHmwnJ18+Az6Fk5CxdEjKdHQKJ54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1daff6e.e808.12dc3148556.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx> <4D40655B.20100@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127083846.GE29664@xxxxxxxx> <sig.7008e5f88f.AANLkTikSkZWkskOCGECNaDuvpS-nnHJRkg9gO3R3OcFw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127110417.GG29664@xxxxxxxx> <sig.200839f1cd.AANLkTinG0kv34S9QitgF3eY2Txv5sdGjj3n-gPZvQTKu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127134858.94674i34u8mfznok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D416C6B.9080204@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Christian Zoffoli <czoffoli@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Il 27/01/2011 13:48, Pierre ha scritto:
> [cut]
>>> Why not just give the 2 LV's to the dom0, and raid it on the dom0
>>> instead? The the domU's still use the "local storage" as before and
>>> they won't know about it.
>>>
>>
>> With that setup, are you able to do live migration ?
>
> no he cannot
>
> he can do live migration if he make the raid1 inside domus
>
>
> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________


Why not?

Live migration only relies on shared storage on the dom0, not on the domU


-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs