WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/nois

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
From: mail ignored <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:32:59 -0800
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:33:36 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ByTULsOOqlLbeoVI+/25u+MCsbGqmRX8I5zzqdX9hrU=; b=KJvsccrBST4KAJUSpI3v4fIgdW0SggBRvZsteA6Bf/07VgNH0XDzAdoXNy5C3hmxOD POLa8m2JwAPqdO9H3fW0HSHpWp2KOxMXPyZjy6PYaGG0TnzoqIBmep3r/D0XHUGYq/dc VJ7pZ7RUN5uar275FEhlp30qDLsy+oo/5Q8vE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XB4kV0MNu6/F61xCUX7mkElcnI8H/geMQCPhBKk8137kwi5Noi+w0lL2y9SW75EIlQ gPiOt0nfkjSqfaEVmd9cBJUMhl5B1rmaf/0c40LfSnKn55jsi9+l8h2qy/hPNyqlHKCJ v/hnXlUjmi+dAYtEFNO/8JQyNzWwO16ajQYrc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100113215549.GA25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100113071325.GU25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113171349.GJ25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131006i47a6889fyb3ba6419dad67116@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113180859.GO25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131010x28d9cd8bu2610195d3cbed57b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113181239.GP25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131025v4c530db0ic37af2636405477a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113183940.GS25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113203818.GU25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113215549.GA25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hi,

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> like Andy pointed out on xen-devel, the xen.gz option is called
> dom0_max_vcpus nowadays.
>
> I verified dom0_max_vcpus=1 works OK with Xen 3.4.2.

I've just been told @novell bugzilla,

 "Please be also advised that dom0_max_vcpus=1 is not recommended (and
not supported); a minimum of 2 should be set here."

Any thoughts/comments?  Should it be used @ =1, or not?  confusing, atm.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>