WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/nois

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
From: mail ignored <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:58:15 -0800
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:59:31 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zlUoOFstq0C5Jwv6/OWpBYV9KgIC5dkMNRA9H9H2lTk=; b=YchEYsPr3ENDMEi/hY8Un10G+LWlP/s2h2aLWuVdq616DIk///eg2KFBnlu+pP3xhu WpVZl5ZAyAmDugt78hCy8aD4LsDGvbsMwYodftnsMfxIH6t3H3/IlBzCX8tYZJ4eJxO7 y+9x32YghIH1No0z0qUccfIksWLrlIy+TTSx4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XrCOIrZloLbFP7INclEPJdDP7K8nUUbwgiHJEbNmfI7+OscWC3IDUouLHJQSAQVdcY 0t8Zd+fLQFL4DapWYBE/LSm4CURh9TcBBwLNCjjzgWGOHIfNCQDPhBgwF28oTUi96+Cl wygQzeT5txWZg+Kaf7o+gzon1miYRJfNfzftA=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100113183940.GS25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c67eed301001121814s37bc44bftf8e4f9a4485f1015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113071325.GU25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001130844p751c8cehd943b07729e08ebd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113171349.GJ25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131006i47a6889fyb3ba6419dad67116@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113180859.GO25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131010x28d9cd8bu2610195d3cbed57b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113181239.GP25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131025v4c530db0ic37af2636405477a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113183940.GS25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I think it's actually two different bugs :)
>
> 1) You should be able to limit the number of dom0 vcpus by dom0_vcpus option
> 2) It shouldn't crash when you remove vcpus from dom0 using vcpu-set.

thanks.

two bugs filed. fyi,

 "Bug 570432 - xen ignores cmd line params to limit/pin Dom0 cpu
utilization" https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570432
 "Bug 570443 - CRASH @ attempt to manually remove vcpus from dom0
using vcpu-set" https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570443

> I'll test dom0_vcpus option on my testbox at some point, with Xen 3.4.x.
> I've been using it successfully with Xen 3.1.x, on RHEL5/CentOS5.

would be helpful to know.  thanks.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>