WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/nois

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
From: mail ignored <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:41:17 -0800
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:41:57 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B0vKyBqdgk1pc6QyjgrJ5FgE7y50k+5iYIFobJsDtvM=; b=OgXA0pof/DWb9s1MCYf4IyUjnB9vqy6IMCiUHNWHVC60R822yGOQBKQ059o6TdORn2 u3mfEQlX/I4XBtvxrrKglO9oprWLSpY/xj3+tgqHC0vYVcYOKKIfMuEPB6ZRRjkpMGIR XYfRVfytpk4kFQM9nvzBDOeoIoMraQp6Sj1yY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fuhDP1RWoluGux9Q5siO/rlNSIdcjoEQafbtwtOfQvnJC49A2aIdbuX8LqJaUghwui 7cUAwt7lG6WJ6qcjvtdmH4Glwd17TznTsAVhKy+2t6h9YSrIcYVdARqZeEfU0O0xqQbG RUZltEahMcgXT2PnIRv2TGQ4knoNMa3t2NJAE=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100113203818.GU25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c67eed301001121814s37bc44bftf8e4f9a4485f1015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001130844p751c8cehd943b07729e08ebd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113171349.GJ25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131006i47a6889fyb3ba6419dad67116@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113180859.GO25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131010x28d9cd8bu2610195d3cbed57b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113181239.GP25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001131025v4c530db0ic37af2636405477a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113183940.GS25902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100113203818.GU25902@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I just tried it on my Fedora 12 testbox with Xen 3.4.2, and I'm seeing
> the same behaviour:
>
> (XEN) Xen version 3.4.2 (root@(none)) (gcc version 4.4.2 20091027 (RedHat 
> 4.4.2-7) (GCC) ) Mon Dec 14 06:53:18 EET 2009
> (XEN) Latest ChangeSet: unavailable
> (XEN) Command line: dom0_mem=1G loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all com1=38400,8n1 
> console=com1 dom0_vcpus=1
> ..
> (XEN) Dom0 has maximum 4 VCPUs

hrm.  bad to see.  good to know.

> I just sent an email to xen-devel asking about it..

i'll keep an eye out there, as well.

thanks.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>