This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS?

To: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS?
From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mercurial List <mercurial@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Thompson <andrewkt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:20:53 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050616011647.GW26633@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D282265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050616011647.GW26633@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:

> foo.c:
>   comment
> ..should preserve things well enough.

Agreed.  I've never really used the "different commit
comment per file" thing in bitkeeper.  Well, I used it
in the beginning, but I stopped using it after I found
out that "bk changes" didn't actually show them anyway!

The Theory of Escalating Commitment: "The cost of continuing mistakes is
borne by others, while the cost of admitting mistakes is borne by yourself."
  -- Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Laureate in Economics

Xen-devel mailing list