Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] xen: sched: refector code around vcpu_deassign() in null scheduler

[Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 17:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/5/19 4:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 26.07.2019 08:25, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > 
> > 1) The commit is empty, presumably because I did apply the patch a
> > few
> > days ago already.
> > 
> > 2) The committer is recorded as "Patchew Importer <
> > importer@xxxxxxxxxxx>".
> > Do we really want to hide the fact who has been committing a patch?
> > While it's mostly mechanical, there's still the human decision of
> > "this
> > is ready to go in" involved, which I don't think a bot can reliably
> > take
> > in all cases.
> 
> Both of these are mistakes, and due to the fact that I `git fetch`ed
> patchew's commit rather than doing `git am` of the mbox provided by
> patchew.  (And I used patchew's commit because somehow 4/4 didn't
> reach
> my inbox.)
>
And this last part is apparently my fault, as your email address is
actually wrong, in the Cc line of that patch.

So I guess I had a part in this as well... Sorry about that! :-)

Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel