[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

> On 1. Aug 2019, at 18:27, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:27 AM Elnikety, Eslam <elnikety@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But t3 is not Xen.
> That's a good reason to not use it. :-) I picked it to be a small,
> cheap instance that would represent a potential use case. Is the t2
> family Xen? Or the m5? I think it makes sense to write the requirement
> as "the lastest version of the foo family" just so that we're not
> updating it every time AWS adds a new version. So I'll defer to you on
> what's the best option for small-and-Xen.

Generally, different families represent different potential use cases, but of 
course I understand the need to identify a small, cheap set. Are we looking to 
cover net/blk-front, ENA, and NVMe? Maybe t2.nano and c5d.large?

> Thanks,
> BC
> -- 
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.