Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

["Elnikety, Eslam" <elnikety@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> On 29. Jul 2019, at 20:58, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM Adam Williamson
> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> OK, so, to move forward with this (and looping in cloud list): does
>> someone want to propose a set (ideally small - 2 would be great, one
>> Xen and one non-Xen, if we can cover most common usages that way!) of
>> EC2 instance types we should test on? With that, we could tweak the
>> criteria a bit to specify those instance types, tweak the Cloud
>> validation page a bit, and then drop the Xen criterion and test case.
>> 
> 
> I'd suggest c5.large (KVM, afaict) and t3.large (Xen).

But t3 is not Xen.

> 
> My AWS experience is probably not representative (being mostly in the
> HPC space), but these seem like they'd hit the two use cases I'd
> expect to see for Fedora (compute and small servers). I would expect
> more people would use M rather than C for Fedora, but this gets us a
> KVM-based instance.
> 
> Happy to hear why I'm wrong. :-)
> 
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel