[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen
- To: "Elnikety, Eslam" <elnikety@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:27:49 -0400
- Authentication-results: mx.messagelabs.com; spf=pass (server-15.tower-304.messagelabs.com: domain of redhat.com designates 209.85.210.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=none (message not signed); dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none adkim=r aspf=r) header.from=redhat.com
- Cc: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>, "marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Committers <committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>, "MICHAEL A. YOUNG" <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:28:14 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:27 AM Elnikety, Eslam <elnikety@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But t3 is not Xen.
>
That's a good reason to not use it. :-) I picked it to be a small,
cheap instance that would represent a potential use case. Is the t2
family Xen? Or the m5? I think it makes sense to write the requirement
as "the lastest version of the foo family" just so that we're not
updating it every time AWS adds a new version. So I'll defer to you on
what's the best option for small-and-Xen.
Thanks,
BC
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
