Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] OSSTEST: introduce a raisin build test

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 14:47 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 14:18 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 12:18 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > > It hasn't actually failed though, is that normal?
> > > > >  
> > > > > It is an "optional" dependency, without it passthrough is 
> > > > > disabled in
> > > > > qemu-traditional. Passing -n tell raisin to "shut up, do nothing 
> > > > > and
> > > > > continue", so at the end the build still succeed.
> > > > 
> > > > What other sorts of things are optional?
> > > 
> > > There isn't really a distinction between mandatory dependencies and
> > > optional dependencies in raisin. This is what raisin is currently
> > > complaining about:
> > > 
> > > bridge-utils pciutils-dev libnl-3-dev libnl-route-3-dev
> > > 
> > > bridge-utils is actually a run time dependency for Xen, while
> > > libnl-3-dev and libnl-route-3-dev are build time dependencies for
> > > libvirt. I think they are needed for vlan support. Should I add them
> > > too?
> > 
> > I think so, I have a feeling Remus might use them too? cf "[PATCH] 
> > osstest:
> > install libnl3 packages" from Roger.
> 
> Actually this is why I cannot remove the buildjob=${bfi}build-$arch
> line: otherwise the build deps don't get installed, right?

I don't think so, ts-xen-build-prep is badly named and is run for any build
job (formally I think anything in sg-run-job where need-hosts/FOO returns
BUILD).

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel