Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] OSSTEST: introduce a raisin build test

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 12:18 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 17:52 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > +sub build () {
> > > +    target_cmd_build($ho, 9000, $builddir, <<END);
> > > +        cd $raisindir
> > > +        ./raise -n build
> > > +END
> > > +#/;
> > 
> > Running this is pretty quiet it seems, which is normally good but I 
> > think
> > for automated test we likely want to crank up the verbosity somewhat. 
> > Is
> > that possible?
> 
> -v for verbose
> 
> ./raise -v -n build
> 
> 
> > Or else if this is being captured into some logfile somewhere we should
> > capture that.
> > 
> > It also said:
> >     [raisin] Missing packages: pciutils-dev
> > which I guess is something which needs to be added to ts-xen-build
> > -prep?
> 
> This is a mismatch between raisin's build dependency list and osstest's.
> I thought that OSSTest might not want to add pciutils-dev as a
> dependency, this is why I didn't add it.

On the contrary I think we probably do want it, especially if without it
passthrough doesn't work, we should be at least build testing that!

> > It hasn't actually failed though, is that normal?
>  
> It is an "optional" dependency, without it passthrough is disabled in
> qemu-traditional. Passing -n tell raisin to "shut up, do nothing and
> continue", so at the end the build still succeed.

What other sorts of things are optional? I think there could be an argument
for osstest insisting on as much stuff as possible being enabled and
therefore for asking raisin to be pedantic about optional deps.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel