[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] (v2) Design proposal for RMRR fix
>>> On 14.01.15 at 13:12, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/14/2015 10:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> for other usages like hotplug/migration: >>> reserved_regions = [ 'host, 0/1', 'start, end, 0/1', 'start, end, 0/1', >>> ...] >>> If 'host' is specified, it implies rmrr_host, besides user can specific >>> explicit ranges according to his detail requirement. >> >> For host the flag makes sense, but for the explicitly specified regions >> - as said before - I don't think it does. > > I thought we wanted to be able to specify regions that weren't on this > host, but were on another host, so that an admin could migrate to > another host and add devices there which might have RMRRs? Correct. But as being admin specified, there shouldn't be a try/force flag associated with them: When the admin asks for such regions, they need to be observed no matter what (or guest creation needs to fail). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |