Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 24332: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 24332: regressions 
- FAIL"):
>>>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  7 windows-install   fail like 
>>>> 24336-bisect
> 
> My point was that this says "fail like 24336-bisect", not "failed in
> 24332, passed in 24336-bisect", i.e. the above only gives
> confirmation that there's a problem, not whether some flight had
> no problem.

24336 will have been a double-check test of the baseline version
carried out by the bisector.  So it gives confirmation that the
problem exists also in the baseline and is therefore not a reason to
block the push.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel