Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 24332: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 10.01.14 at 14:48, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 24332: 
> regressions - FAIL"):
>> On 10.01.14 at 14:11, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>> >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  7 windows-install   fail like 
>> > 24336-bisect
>> 
>> Whereas this one (which iirc blocked the previous two test runs
>> from doing a push) is now considered allowable?
> 
> Yes, because 24336 proves it doesn't happen consistently.

Does it? To me it looks like there were only failures since yesterday's
new commits went in - I don't recall having seen a flight report with
this not failing (but then again the names of the tests are similar
enough that I may mix things up).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel