Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 24332: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 24332: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> On 10.01.14 at 14:48, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Whereas this one (which iirc blocked the previous two test runs
> >> from doing a push) is now considered allowable?
> > 
> > Yes, because 24336 proves it doesn't happen consistently.
> 
> Does it? To me it looks like there were only failures since yesterday's
> new commits went in - I don't recall having seen a flight report with
> this not failing (but then again the names of the tests are similar
> enough that I may mix things up).

You wouldn't have seen 24336 because it was part of an attempt as
bisection.  The bisection flights' reports aren't emailed to xen-devel
because they're very numerous.

> >> >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  7 windows-install   fail like 
> >> > 24336-bisect

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel