Re: [Xen-devel] which Dom0 should I use in my regular testing?

[Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:38:56PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 15:33 +0100, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> > Sorry, ping... 
> > Any suggestions?  Also CC Ian Campbell for suggestion.
> 
> I think the latest kernel from upstream's stable series would be a
> reasonable basis for testing xen on.
> 

I think the upstream Linux 'stable' series is 3.0.x currently? 

Linux 3.4.x is the first kernel with Xen ACPI cpufreq / power management 
patches included,
so it makes sense to use 3.4+ ?


-- Pasi


> > 
> > Best Regards,
> >      Yongjie (Jay)
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ren, Yongjie
> > > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 4:05 PM
> > > To: ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [Xen-devel] which Dom0 should I use in my regular testing?
> > > 
> > > Hi Jackson,
> > > Our team spares some effort in regular testing against xen-unstable tree.
> > > I know you are doing some testing against xen.
> > > Which Dom0 are you using in your oss test, Konrad's xen.git or upstream
> > > linux.git ?
> > > And which Dom0 do you recommend in my regular testing?
> > > (Not sure you are the right person for this question? :-) )
> > > 
> > > Best Regards,
> > >      Yongjie (Jay)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel