Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 12876: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 10:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.05.12 at 11:27, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 08:12 +0100, xen.org wrote:
> >> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail in 12860 pass in 
> >> 12876
> > 
> > qemuu is still a bit flakey. It's not the default qemu for 4.2 but would
> > still be nice to investigate.
> 
> Isn't it being made the default at least for pv guests?

Right, yes. I should have made it clear I was talking about HVM here.

>  After having fixed
> the gntdev driver in our kernels and the pvops-centric shortcomings in
> both qemu-s, the qdisk backend still looks somewhat unreliable in
> testing that Olaf has performed. We haven't narrowed it so far, but
> a resulting question of course is whether using that backend (and/or
> qemu-upstream) by default for any guests is a good idea.

CCing Stefano who made the patch to have PV guests use this guy. Please
do share details when you have them.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel