Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] tools/libxc: Remus Checkpoint Compression

[George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is no change to live migration protocol. Its just the remus
> replication
> protocol, which I would be happy to document in xg_save_restore.h.
>
> Can I send that as a separate patch? George already acked the code part
> of the patch (see b4974a38d10199c1e2b8.1308457939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

FYI, I am not (and do not wish to be) the maintainer for the
save/restore/migration/remus code; I'm just an interested party (since
if it breaks, I'm going to have to deal with it when it comes into
XenServer).  As such, my "Ack" was only meant to mean, "I'm fine with
this" (since I had raised an objection before).  IanJ's approval is
still needed for check-in.

 -George

>
> shriram
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 14:55 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> > Hmm -- while you're at it, could you add a comment somewhere in this
>> > area saying that this is part of the wire protocol that can't be
>> > changed without breaking backwards compatibility?
>>
>> Also please update tools/libxl/xg_save_restore.h to document the
>> protocol extensions/changes.
>>
>> Ian.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel