 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Bond question
| To: | Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Bond question |
| From: | Paras pradhan <pradhanparas@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:45:27 -0600 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:48:12 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TVCcunPFQJZDtjyM7lfSvWyxaHGsKnfPeIRV70Iidtw=; b=AWnkuQsumV0iW3OZisMPkDlEzV1fXyohQbmjFLNPBxqBvEwyjyUl9Z1Kogcor58gDP sPFUtj5yaFnylF4gF18WmxTkH96jO4qn+LB9iNnU0gLkn/0ZsIH67jzMXdG7ynAb7Pu6 YpXQQXwy2a5SIps7LlXaT/lK8keU1HiIWwCPw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VUC7Y3hWVEun6Y3n5kFZv7952PjyTouGxq123iW7ZrW4Z3/rCWEh6aNWu/ScSAXFQs 8LMhrfeMWCwJ1oy3FH+NaJRSbEs9tMFkqhuPEoCHGr0DOF1mf/cKeYrwh7xBTkY2Xdyo JYl2VYa9VchruNRypn6USZjAWDSJ8CBokL/zc= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4D5C4448.2020507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <AANLkTinwUErphwGVRzCbEPwH5vSUC3doo_h8LsPoAKoa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D5C4448.2020507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Other two bonds are on the same switches. They seems to be fine.. Paras. On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/16/2011 3:31 PM, Paras pradhan wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have several nics (1Gbps) in my server running xen 3 by Redhat. >> >> When I check /proc/net/bonding/pbond0 , i see it is running in 100mbps >> only. >> >> -- >> Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.4.0-1 (October 7, 2008) >> >> Bonding Mode: fault-tolerance (active-backup) >> Primary Slave: None >> Currently Active Slave: eth6 >> MII Status: up >> MII Polling Interval (ms): 100 >> Up Delay (ms): 0 >> Down Delay (ms): 0 >> >> Slave Interface: eth6 >> MII Status: up >> Speed: 100 Mbps >> Duplex: full >> Link Failure Count: 0 >> Permanent HW addr: 00:26:b9:66:2f:43 >> >> Slave Interface: eth7 >> MII Status: up >> Speed: 100 Mbps >> Duplex: full >> Link Failure Count: 0 >> Permanent HW addr: 00:26:b9:66:2f:45 >> --- >> >> Is this normal? >> >> I have other two bonds as well. They are fine and running in 1Gbps speed. >> >> What went wrong with the 1st bond? >> >> >> Thanks! >> Paras. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > Depending on your switch you may need to force the speed option. I had to in > my Cisco 4507R. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] NIC bonding - missing eth0?, Fajar A. Nugraha |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Bond question, Donny Brooks |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Bond question, Donny Brooks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Bond question, Donny Brooks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
