|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM
> What is generally used in industry? At max capacity, my setup will hold
> up to 672 DomUs spread over 6 Xen hosts (And 3 RAID10 arrays on a single
> storage server), so clearly management is a big concern. This is where I
> feel that LVM/iSCSI based access is easier?
>
Hello,
I doubt that a single storage server should be able to "feed" so many
VMs, even if they are not IO hungry, the network bandwidth would be very
high and you will have to use very high speed network devices and
routers/switches and a big SAN with many high speed links.
Regards
JPP
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
- RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM,
jpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <=
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Igor Shalakhin
|
|
|
|
|