|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM
Well, it would be a lot easier (and just as cheap) to use NFS.
The only downside to NFS might be that it is not accessible from Windows.
But it is much simpler to setup. eaisier to maintain, faster to
troubleshoot. test friendlier and a lot more used.
So basically, what benefits does iSCSI offer you, that NFS doesn't?
HTH,
Regards,
Serge Fonville
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Also, why exactly have you chosen to use iSCSI?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There is nothing else that I can afford. What other options are there?
--
http://www.sergefonville.nl
Convince Google!!
They need to support Adsense over SSL
https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=10528
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=1884bc9310d9f923&hl=en
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, JP P
- RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
- RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
- RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM,
Serge Fonville <=
- RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, jpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
|
|
|
|
|