WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] How many guests

To: Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] How many guests
From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 23:10:55 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:12:51 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1275862359.3408.5.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4C0AD5A6.9040307@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4C0BF478.6040903@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C0BF94E.10806@xxxxxxxxxxx> <201006062321.30750.bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C0C1924.1000605@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1275862359.3408.5.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4
Yup indeed I am.

My Xen host only has space for 2 drives, so I'd need a seperate storage server with more slots and expose it via iSCSI or something

On 06/06/10 23:12, Bart Coninckx wrote:

I'm confused: how are you going to connect a RAID10 via a network? Are you talking about a seperate storage server?

----- Original message -----
> If I were to install a RAID10 array, would it be ok if I connected it to
> my Xen host via gigabit ethernet?
>
>
> On 06/06/10 22:21, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> > RAID1 does not perform better than a single disk. It will still depend on what
> > those 5 to 10 VMs would do. It still might be stretching it. For 10 webservers
> > visited by 5 users per hour: I would say no problem. For 5 heavily used
> > database servers it will be another story.
> >
> > I guess the only real way to find out is to put your guests on there and try.
> > If you clone them, you will know quite fast.
> >
> >
> > On Sunday 06 June 2010 21:38:54 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> >     
> > > Thanks Micael,
> > >
> > > I understand what you are saying.
> > >
> > > With a small setup such as a RAID1 array, how many VMs could I rent out?
> > >
> > > It doesn't matter if it's a small number, it's just to utilise the
> > > server a bit.
> > >
> > > Think it would cope with 5-10?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > On 06/06/10 20:18, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> > >         
> > > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > >
> > > > if you plan to migrate existing physical machines to xen VMs, or you
> > > > have some different machines for a comparison,
> > > > you can easy get runtime statistics and calculate the usage. Look at
> > > > the running iostats and cpu usage.
> > > >
> > > > If you plan to rent generic VMs on this server to customers, you disk
> > > > / raid setup will be absolutely the bottleneck.
> > > > A solution at this point is not easy. If you have much write IOs, use
> > > > raid 10 with 4 to 8 disks. With many reads - raid 6 or 50 with the
> > > > same amount of disks.
> > > > In each case i can suggest you 15k rpm SAS disks.
> > > >
> > > > Then you can run 29 VMs. Or 60 VMs with 16GB memory and 2 CPUs.
> > > >
> > > > But note: You cannot set disk priority to the VMs. So if one VM does
> > > > heavy disk IO, all off the other VMs slowed down.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards
> > > >
> > > > Michael Schmidt
> > > >
> > > > Am 06.06.10 20:45, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
> > > >             
> > > > > Hi Michael,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your email.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is just an idea that I have floating around in my head that
> > > > > maybe I'd like to rent out some VPSs to customers, just to utilise my
> > > > > machine which will be sitting in a co-lo nearly idle.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd give out VPSs with 256MB RAM and probably 5Mbps connection speed.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the answer is, I don't know what will be running on them, however
> > > > > I could write up an "acceptable use policy", as well as use some
> > > > > throttling/scheduling?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > On 06/06/10 19:39, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> > > > >                 
> > > > > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the question is, what a kind of VM?
> > > > > > You can over-utilize a much greater machine with one VM.
> > > > > > Or on the other side, you can run 40 VMs on a shorter machine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Each ressource can be a bottleneck
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Memory - this is realy easy to calculate: Avaiable minus 768MB
> > > > > > (Reserved for Dom0 should be enugh in this case).
> > > > > > - CPU - Here we need a VM statistic
> > > > > > - Disk Bandwidth - Here we need a VM statistic, but in the most
> > > > > > cases not the bottleneck
> > > > > > - Disk IOPS - Here we need a VM statistic, in the most cases the
> > > > > > botelneck
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What a kind of VMs you plane to run?
> > > > > > Webservers / mailservers / database-servers ...?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael Schmidt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am 06.06.10 00:54, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
> > > > > >                     
> > > > > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have a Dell R210 server which has a Xeon X3430 Quad Core CPU
> > > > > > > (2.4Ghz x 4) with 8GB of RAM. I intend to use the H200 controller
> > > > > > > in a RAID1 setup
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How many VMs do you think I'd be able to run on this machine? Is 20
> > > > > > > pushing it?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd say most (if not all) guests would be in PV mode.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > > > > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > > > > >                         
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > > >                 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > >
> > >         

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>