This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] IBM x445, anyone using it?

> > While searching on why I can't seem to get ServeRAID 4Mx controllers
> > working all of a sudden, I came across an article on IBM's site that
> > VMWare runs on the even older x440.
> >
> > Does that mean that Xen is the culprit, not being very compatible with
> > older gear or something else?
> Not necessarily...  it's all a matter of limitations. You'll find that
> VMware on those boxen is, like Xen, limited to 32 bit OSs and all the
> physical limitations of hte 32 bit architecture...  the versions of
> VMware that we tested on 440s, 445s and that generation of System X
> machines was based on RHEL 2.1 and RHEL 3.  So you're limited by the
> limitations of the underlying OS...

Nb VMware would give you full virtualisation support on your pre-HVM hardware, 
which Xen can't give you.

> Xen, on the other hand, works rather well with RHEL 5 and SLES 10, and
> I've heard, though not tried this myself, RHEL 4 and SLES 9.
> heck, I'm running it right now on an old single core box w/ RHEL 5.1
> and 16GB ram for my own development purposes...

I suggest you try a "vanilla" virt-manager install of a non-preconfigured 
guest, as Jeff described in his previous e-mail.  As he observed, since dom0 
is apparently booting OK on your machine, your hardware is basically 100% 
certain to be able to support Xen domUs as well.  If dom0 boots, paravirt 
domUs should *always* boot.

What you're running into is most to be a weird CentOS / virt-manager behaviour 
rather than a true Xen problem or a hardware-specific problem.


Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)

Xen-users mailing list