This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] IBM x445, anyone using it?

> Yep.  The max for a single node x445 is 8 processors, no dual core
> support that I am aware of.

What type of processors should I be looking for which are properly supported 

> showed up in RHEL and SLES.  Also, to the best of my recollection,
> they were 32bit only boxes.  And, as I said before, there is no
> hardware virutalization support on those processors or BIOS.

Yes, 32bit.

> Just from the little bit you have shared, your problem has NOTHING to
> do with hardware virtualization, unless you are trying to take a HVM
> guest from one Xen box that supports VT, and trying to run it on a
> different Xen box that does NOT support VT.

It's just a fresh CentOS install with Virtualization because I wanted to try 
out Xen.
> Sounds more like a filesystem issue or something like that.

I'm not sure that there is a problem, perhaps a little configuration which is 
not installed by default or such?
> Really, use virt-manager or YaST and install a paravirtualized guest
> just to see if it works.  Besides, you have a running system, and a
> running Dom0, so Xen works.  Dom0 is, in reality, just a
> paravirtualized guest OS running on the hypervisor.

That's exactly what I've tried and received the path error :).
Using Virtual Machine Manager, I've tried to install a pre-configured ISO. It 
was simply what I had handy. I can try something else. Is there something I can 
try from the command line? I just want a basic Linux install, no servers, 
nothing for now.
> What does this mean?  You copied a working guest filesystem image to
> your new Xen box, or you copied an install tree?  What OS are you
> using for the Host?  What OS are you using for the guest?  How is your
> install tree set up (file tree, ISO, or what?)

It's an ISO of a pre-installed CentOS OS with qmail pre-configured along with 
other tools. Just had it handy when I first gave this a quick try.
> Again, as I said before, you will not have Fully Virtualized abilities
> on the x445, it does not support the hardware virtualization code, and
> I am almost sure that it won't even support the processors that have
> HVM code on them (Though that is just a guess, so YMMV there).

That's fine, like I too said, I just happen to have these machines sitting here 
so was hoping I might be able to use them with Xen. From what I can tell, I 
won't be needing fully virtualized machines anyhow. I don't tend to consolidate 
things which I try to get the most power from. In other words, I won't be 
virtualizing machines which need to be as powerful as they can be. I will be 
virtualizing machines which don't do a lot, DNS servers for example are pretty 
simple I/O machines, very low use web, mail, other servers, things like that.
> And to answer your other questions... virtualbox may work, but it's
> rather new, and I've never tried it myself.  VMWare MAY work,

I didn't ask about this but I think it's in the thread somewhere. Either way, 
if I can use the x445 for non fully virtualized machines, that still would be 
cool. It would allow me to shut down a couple dozen low use boxes, virtualizing 
them along with their storage on SAN.

> But again, you have Xen booted, and a running Dom0, so Xen is doing
> what it's supposed to do... my money is on a bad install tree (which
> is what that error you shared seems to point to) or trying to run a
> full virt guest from one Xen box on a second Xen box that does not
> support full virt.

I'll look around for a guest which is known to easily work para-virtualized. If 
you know of one, please let me know in the meantime. Thanks.


Xen-users mailing list