This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] IBM x445, anyone using it?

Simple enough to give this a try, or, not really :).
I recently worked on consolidating a bunch of storage which included a new NFS 
server for access to my distros for network installs. Having to finish this 
leads me to a dozen other things which need to get done, which leads to a 
number of... it just goes on.

I'll get back to this as soon as I get a handle on the work I had started 

While searching on why I can't seem to get ServeRAID 4Mx controllers working 
all of a sudden, I came across an article on IBM's site that VMWare runs on the 
even older x440.

Does that mean that Xen is the culprit, not being very compatible with older 
gear or something else?


On Mon, 19 May 2008 19:42:03 +0100, Mark Williamson wrote:
>>> Just from the little bit you have shared, your problem has NOTHING to
>>> do with hardware virtualization, unless you are trying to take a HVM
>>> guest from one Xen box that supports VT, and trying to run it on a
>>> different Xen box that does NOT support VT.
>> It's just a fresh CentOS install with Virtualization because I wanted to
>> try out Xen.
>>> Sounds more like a filesystem issue or something like that.
>> I'm not sure that there is a problem, perhaps a little configuration which
>> is not installed by default or such?
>>> Really, use virt-manager or YaST and install a paravirtualized guest
>>> just to see if it works.  Besides, you have a running system, and a
>>> running Dom0, so Xen works.  Dom0 is, in reality, just a
>>> paravirtualized guest OS running on the hypervisor.
>> That's exactly what I've tried and received the path error :).
>> Using Virtual Machine Manager, I've tried to install a pre-configured ISO.
>> It was simply what I had handy. I can try something else. Is there
>> something I can try from the command line? I just want a basic Linux
>> install, no servers, nothing for now.
>>> What does this mean?  You copied a working guest filesystem image to
>>> your new Xen box, or you copied an install tree?  What OS are you
>>> using for the Host?  What OS are you using for the guest?  How is your
>>> install tree set up (file tree, ISO, or what?)
>> It's an ISO of a pre-installed CentOS OS with qmail pre-configured along
>> with other tools. Just had it handy when I first gave this a quick try.
> ISO usually refers to an image of a DVD/CD-ROM but it sounds like you're
> talking about an image of a hard drive, am I right?  Or are you using a
> custom CD-ROM or something like that?
> You can't install a paravirtualised guest from a disk, it needs to be a net
> install, with you supplying a location of an online (possibly a local
> mirror)
> RPM repository.
> Alternatively if you're copying existing hard drive images directly
> into /var/lib/xen/images and then trying to boot them, I suppose there could
> be some kind of SELinux labelling issue going on here...
>> I didn't ask about this but I think it's in the thread somewhere. Either
>> way, if I can use the x445 for non fully virtualized machines, that still
>> would be cool. It would allow me to shut down a couple dozen low use
>> boxes,
>> virtualizing them along with their storage on SAN.
> You should be able to run PV domains on them without too much bother.  As
> Jeff
> notes, if dom0 is booted successfully everything *should* work OK once the
> setup issues are resolved.
> Since your hardware *definitely* should support PV guests OK based on what
> we've seen, I think we need to go back-to-basics a bit in debugging this.  
> In
> addition to my questions above, it would be helpful to have a more specific
> idea of the steps you have taken during the attempted installation of this
> guest, so that we can see what went wrong and how.
>> I'll look around for a guest which is known to easily work
>> para-virtualized. If you know of one, please let me know in the meantime.
>> Thanks.
> CentOS > 4.5 should work OK as a PV guest, as should Fedora releases for the
> past few years.  You ought to be able to network install them in virt-
> manager
> fairly straightforwardly once we've figured out what your current problem
> is.
> Cheers,
> Mark

Xen-users mailing list