 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] NIC bonding
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] NIC bonding |
| From: | "Jerry Amundson" <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:51:15 -0600 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:51:10 -0800 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ot7c4s7dwfGy3A3Z7tjCa/Yc05XjcPMw9PYNXWGc6EifTX7Z+gJNublH4nMR9zVwvaoY/XI32lZm1sZ9E+c2jT1bJ27CWbUDyLEawimmSEpu4dGmYKJm87WjL+xnk78f/7xPW+UFzUfn6lcjRq67YCQwL5DkM7XDFuWPgoBOV6o= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <6d06ce20701271110j54be6270sfb3ecc7cbc0f6125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <200701271706.54227.dick.kniep@xxxxxxxxx> <200701271740.56588.dick.kniep@xxxxxxxxx> <6d06ce20701271110j54be6270sfb3ecc7cbc0f6125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 1/27/07, Jerry Amundson <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: On 1/27/07, Dick Kniep <dick.kniep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi list > > Forgot to mention that added the lines: > > alias bond0 > options bond0 mode=balance-alb miimon=1000 > > This was causing the problems, changed "mode=balance-alb" to "mode=0" and > works like a charm now. Good one. As I'm close to doing this, am wondering what OS? Looks like Redhat 4 or clone? With Xen 3.0.4-1, maybe.... and "bond0", so you've had to customize the vif setup too...? Ah, that didn't make sense, as I also realize this is domU, which of course is where the bonding should be... jerry -- "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!" _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] Possible?: dom0 and dom1 in network A using eth0, dom2 in network B using eth1, Steve Brueckner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Xen on Cray, Alejandro Leyva |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] NIC bonding, Jerry Amundson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] NIC bonding, Ulrich Windl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
