Re: [Xen-users] Performance issues

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:57:21AM +0200, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:18:18 -0400
> Matt Ayres <matta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The SEDF scheduler is not necessarily 
> > the best for every workload. Would you mind re-running the first part
> > of 
> > the tests (or all if you have the time), but use the BVT scheduler 
> > instead?  To set CPU weights you can use the cpu_weight variable in
> > the 
> > domain config file (ex. cpu_weight = "2").  libxc/xc_domain.c seems to
> 
> > still use that method for setting the weight. Note it does not use 
> > cpu_weight for SEDF. Also, in 3.0.2 you can run "xm sched-sedf domid"
> > to 
> > get settings, no need for the external sedf program.
> 
> 
> Thank you for the hint. I will run test with the BVT scheduler and I
> will compare results with sEDF scheduler. I will post results next week
> (with pretty graph ;).
>

So, did you already have time to do the tests? I'm interested of the
results..

-- Pasi

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	[Xen-users] Vanderpool Hardware Question, Goran
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] Performance issues, Stephan Austermühle
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] Performance issues, Guillaume Thouvenin
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] Performance issues, Stephan Austermühle
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]