|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization? 
| > > RHEL5.x will always support a PV dom0 and not require VT processors for
> > Xen.
>
> Absolutely. And as I mentioned, since RHEL5 supports both PV and HVM
> guests, we're pretty well committed to whatever ships in RHEL6 doing the
> same -- or at least providing an easy upgrade path, so that any and all
> guests created under RHEL5 will continue to be usable under RHEL6.
Presumably there's the option of creating a shim to shoehorn legacy guests 
into an HVM container?  Does IA64 use a hypercall transfer page?
Cheers,
Mark
-- 
Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Juergen Gross
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex WilliamsonRe: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, (continued)
 
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Tristan GingoldRe: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Jarod Wilson
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |