|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization? 
| Alex Williamson wrote:
> I would expect
> RHEL5.x will always support a PV dom0 and not require VT processors for
> Xen.
Absolutely. And as I mentioned, since RHEL5 supports both PV and HVM guests,
we're pretty well committed to whatever ships in RHEL6 doing the same -- or at
least providing an easy upgrade path, so that any and all guests created under
RHEL5 will continue to be usable under RHEL6.
-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
  signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 _______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Juergen Gross
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex WilliamsonRe: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, (continued)
 
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Tristan GingoldRe: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?,
Jarod Wilson <=
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |