|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e
Le Vendredi 10 Mars 2006 09:27, Xu, Anthony a écrit :
> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>
> >Sent: 2006年3月10日 16:13
> >This is the way fc is privatized.
> >You need to privatize fc because its semantic is different in CPL0 and CPL
> > != 0. You couldn't use a break (at least during the privatize area), so
> > Dan used a priv op with special registers.
> >
> >Maybe this area is over and this could be now cleaned.
>
> Understand, so the question changes to,
> Doesn't fc use register whose index is larger than 63?
It may, but it don't.
I suppose privatize checks this. According to Dan work, the answer is no.
Note we only speak about fc in kernel.
Tristan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e,
Tristan Gingold <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
|
|
|
|
|