|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年3月10日 16:13
>This is the way fc is privatized.
>You need to privatize fc because its semantic is different in CPL0 and CPL !=
>0. You couldn't use a break (at least during the privatize area), so Dan
>used a priv op with special registers.
>
>Maybe this area is over and this could be now cleaned.
>
Understand, so the question changes to,
Doesn't fc use register whose index is larger than 63?
Thanks,
Anthony
>Tristan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e,
Xu, Anthony <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e, Xu, Anthony
|
|
|
|
|