 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] xentrace: replace ASSERT with printk
| To: | Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] xentrace: replace ASSERT with printk in __trace_var |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:37:54 +0100 |
| Cc: | George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:39:12 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ka/Zv3uvWj2VQig17CN1LrDEQF8yfuVpXI9+hxLBB3g=; b=NvDcXlUdaeEQS4vsNYt36/P+nERqGnyKW4AKK8qQgPGbeyMBcB/36X5+WoeGtzs0QN yrr6ph9xTveTdMLuwUZiHOGpKZZBz/servAgNW4k39U7vpa0l7dHeW+8Dc64Rs1IBXF0 YlZpc18+92WkhDkKWW787VGFrUYsnmisg682U= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110718090416.GA23376@xxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcxFLl5PQHUacVX0dUSWVNTMKBbuxg== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] xentrace: replace ASSERT with printk in __trace_var |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 |
On 18/07/2011 10:04, "Olaf Hering" <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, Keir Fraser wrote: > >> It's not like we have dodgy third-party drivers to worry about. Just fix the >> code -- *which is in the tree!* -- that is making the bad calls! It was >> correct to make this an assert/bug_on in the first place. > > trace_irq_mask() was the only function I found with a too large buffer. Yes, the fix was the very next email I looked at. I've applied it. Thanks! -- Keir > Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 6] libxl: Keyed unions key off an enum instead of an arbitrary expression, Ian Campbell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: update machine_to_phys_order on resume, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] xentrace: replace ASSERT with printk in __trace_var, Olaf Hering |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] xentrace: replace ASSERT with printk in __trace_var, George Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
