WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/14] x86/ticketlock: convert spin loop to C

To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/14] x86/ticketlock: convert spin loop to C
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:08:33 -0800
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:13:44 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <cover.1289940821.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <cover.1289940821.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cover.1289940821.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cover.1289940821.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>

The inner loop of __ticket_spin_lock isn't doing anything very special,
so reimplement it in C.

For the 8 bit ticket lock variant, we use a register union to get direct
access to the lower and upper bytes in the tickets, but unfortunately gcc
won't generate a direct comparison between the two halves of the register,
so the generated asm isn't quite as pretty as the hand-coded version.
However benchmarking shows that this is actually a small improvement in
runtime performance on some benchmarks, and never a slowdown.

We also need to make sure there's a barrier at the end of the lock loop
to make sure that the compiler doesn't move any instructions from within
the locked region into the region where we don't yet own the lock.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h |   58 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
index d6d5784..f48a6e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -58,21 +58,21 @@
 #if (NR_CPUS < 256)
 static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-       unsigned short inc = 1 << TICKET_SHIFT;
-
-       asm volatile (
-               LOCK_PREFIX "xaddw %w0, %1\n"
-               "1:\t"
-               "cmpb %h0, %b0\n\t"
-               "je 2f\n\t"
-               "rep ; nop\n\t"
-               "movb %1, %b0\n\t"
-               /* don't need lfence here, because loads are in-order */
-               "jmp 1b\n"
-               "2:"
-               : "+Q" (inc), "+m" (lock->slock)
-               :
-               : "memory", "cc");
+       register union {
+               struct __raw_tickets tickets;
+               unsigned short slock;
+       } inc = { .slock = 1 << TICKET_SHIFT };
+
+       asm volatile (LOCK_PREFIX "xaddw %w0, %1\n"
+                     : "+Q" (inc), "+m" (lock->slock) : : "memory", "cc");
+
+       for (;;) {
+               if (inc.tickets.head == inc.tickets.tail)
+                       goto out;
+               cpu_relax();
+               inc.tickets.head = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head);
+       }
+out:   barrier();              /* make sure nothing creeps before the lock is 
taken */
 }
 
 static __always_inline int __ticket_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -105,22 +105,22 @@ static __always_inline void 
__ticket_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
        unsigned inc = 1 << TICKET_SHIFT;
-       unsigned tmp;
+       __ticket_t tmp;
 
-       asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "xaddl %0, %1\n"
-                    "movzwl %w0, %2\n\t"
-                    "shrl $16, %0\n\t"
-                    "1:\t"
-                    "cmpl %0, %2\n\t"
-                    "je 2f\n\t"
-                    "rep ; nop\n\t"
-                    "movzwl %1, %2\n\t"
-                    /* don't need lfence here, because loads are in-order */
-                    "jmp 1b\n"
-                    "2:"
-                    : "+r" (inc), "+m" (lock->slock), "=&r" (tmp)
-                    :
-                    : "memory", "cc");
+       asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "xaddl %0, %1\n\t"
+                    : "+r" (inc), "+m" (lock->slock)
+                    : : "memory", "cc");
+
+       tmp = inc;
+       inc >>= TICKET_SHIFT;
+
+       for (;;) {
+               if ((__ticket_t)inc == tmp)
+                       goto out;
+               cpu_relax();
+               tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head);
+       }
+out:   barrier();              /* make sure nothing creeps before the lock is 
taken */
 }
 
 static __always_inline int __ticket_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-- 
1.7.2.3


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel