Re: [Xen-devel] gcc4: char * vs unsigned char *

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2005, at 19:38, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > I'm willing to do the work to standardise on one, if the Xen
> > maintainers think this is worth doing.  Otherwise I'll just
> > get rid of the -Werror for now ...
> 
> Please choose the easiest one to standardise on and send us a patch.

In doubt, I follow whatever is specified in the glibc man pages ;)

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Domain 0 SMP, Christian Limpach

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] frontend and backend, Zhiyi Huang

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] gcc4: char * vs unsigned char *, Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] gcc4: char * vs unsigned char *, Ian Pratt

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]