This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] can Xen coexist/cooperate with a windows/linux dual-boot

To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, "richard heade" <richard.heade@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] can Xen coexist/cooperate with a windows/linux dual-boot system?
From: "Nick Couchman" <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:17:23 -0700
Cc: Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:18:27 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 2009/12/27 at 20:22, "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:34 AM, richard heade <richard.heade@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>> thanks for the response, but it leaves me wondering what's the point of
>> full virtualization.
> Let's see ... hardware consolidation? cloud computing? hosted vps?

I think the question, more specifically, is why use full virutalization (HVM) 
instead of paravirtualization?  The answers you gave apply to the question, 
"Why use virtualization at all?"  However, as far as Full vs. Para, the answer 
is that Paravirtualization is much more efficient in resource utilization, but 
full virtualization allows for running operating systems that are not "aware" 
of the fact that they are virtualized or are not compatible with Xen's idea of 

>> I can install the tweaked  OS for
>> paravirtualization, or I can tweak the hardware configuration for an
>> already installed OS for full virtualization.  Either way I can't go
>> back to the original OS when I, as occasionally happens, get my linux
>> system hosed up.
> That's because you use windows. Seriously.
> You should ask MS if they provide a solution for what you're trying to
> achieve, but I doubt you'd get satisfactory response even with their
> Hyper-V.

Ha!  I'd love to see Microsoft provide a Xen-compatible PV kernel, but I'm not 
holding my breath - I can see them only doing this in a Hyper-V world, but I 
think "enlightened" Windows essentially already does this.  Unfortunately it 
isn't a true PV kernel, which means you still need HVM support for Xen.


This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use 
of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or you are 
not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, 
please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) 
Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly 
prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this 
message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have received this 
message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and 
delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in this message 
that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor 
attributable to SEAKR.

Xen-users mailing list