WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Problem with Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708bn

To: "Alexander Hoßdorf" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <rem@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Problem with Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708bnx2
From: "Nick Couchman" <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:49:58 -0600
Cc:
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:50:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I have the PE1950s with the on-board Broadcom chipset and an add-in Intel Pro 1000 card.  I'm running SLES10 SP2 (Xen 3.2.0) and I don't see this behavior at all.


-Nick

>>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at  9:21 AM, Alexander Hoßdorf <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I ran into trouble with this NICs a few times, too.
Be sure you have a new driver version.
I don't know which version Xen 3.0.3 RPM delivers. Couldy you tell me?

And perhaps you should give James Harpers Paradrivers a chance.

Cheers,
Alex



rem@xxxxxxx schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two NICs Broadcom NetXtreme II
> BCM5708 1000Base-T. I installed CentOS 5.1 and Xen 3.0.3 (RPM). One of
> my virtual machines has Windows 2003 Server. In this virtual machine
> my NICs appears like “Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC”.
> The problem is that when I ping to other machines sometimes the reply
> time value is very high:
>
> C:> ping 10.1.1.1
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=-29815ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=-298341ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=29382ms TTL=127
>
> Reply from 10.1.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
>
> It important to indicate that the “real” time is good ( approximately
> between 1 and 2 seconds ). The problem is some applications used this
> value to monitor some servers and send alarms when time value is high.
> How you can see some time the reply value is negative.
>
> The problem is only with virtual Windows machine.
>
> What can I do? Some idea?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help
>
> Roberto
>
>




This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users