WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Xen Setup

To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Xen Setup
From: "Alan" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 21:29:04 -0700
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:29:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi William,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

Basically I would like to utilise x86_64 especially since the hardware supports it.

 

I will be working with hardware that will have 8GB ram. The idea is a VPS will be allocated x amount of ram that should be a hard limit similar to how a normal dedicated server would behave when you hit your physical ram limit.

 

Disk IO will be fairly moderate, and won’t be beyond fairly standard levels.

 

-Alan

 

-----Original Message-----
From: William Pitcock [mailto:nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 7 August 2008 12:15 PM
To: Alan Lam
Cc: venefax; xen-users
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Xen Setup

 

Hi,

 

On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 18:03 -0700, Alan wrote:

> We don’t do anything fancy really, just the straight out VPS like no

> other. We don’t map PCI devices to VPSes etc. It really is just an OS

> on a disk with a memory allocation.

>

>

> Considering you have both, would you be able to give a brief

> advantages/disadvantages between using OpenVZ and Xen? I have been

> considering OpenVZ as well as Xen and Xen was looking a little better

> on the IO performance side.

>

 

Xen has no real advantages over Virtuozzo with I/O, although it is very easy to integrate SAN solutions like ATA-over-Ethernet and iSCSI. I have a fairly large cluster mostly fed by an ATA-over-Ethernet meshed SAN, and the performance is quite acceptable.

 

>

> Thing is, we would like to be able to take advantage of the fact the

> CPU can handle 64bit and would like to run a 64bit Xen host along with

> 64bit VPSes. I am not sure if Xen can do this or not, nor whether

> OpenVZ can either.

>

 

Roughly 98% of my customers are on x86-64 instances. Approximately 20 are still on x86-32 instances. All of our dom0's except for one node is

x86-64 capable (dual Opteron 2216 hardware from Rackable Systems).

 

Personally, I have found that Xen's behaviour is a lot more reliable on

x86-64 than it is on x86-32. But maybe that's just my setup.

 

>

> If you look at my original post to the mailing list, we are

> considering the switchover because of new hardware/newer OS.

>

 

What hardware do you have? Virtuozzo's memory overcommitting would probably be useful to you if you are working with lowspec hardware (<= 8GB). I know that with Xen, we have reached capacity limits a few times because the customer growth was increasing more rapidly than we could order and rack more hardware for the clusters.

 

Furthermore, anything I have said about Virtuozzo can be applied to OpenVZ without much difficulty.

 

William

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users