|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen without the X 
| 
Shane D. Johnson wrote:
 Ahh. Not an unusual approach, but resolving the compilation dependencies 
sounds quite painful.
Nico,
I am trying to build a minimal server with Apache and Qmail(Most 
likely) in separate domains with only the programs and services 
necessary to run these programs on each domain.  I am doing this to 
keep the disk space small (for performance and backup), the 
performance high , and the security threats down (only have running 
what you need). 
Thanks
Shane
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
 
Shane D. Johnson wrote:
 Why do you want to do this? Unweaving the X requirements for the VNC 
or SDL graphical console support sounds like a great deal of pain.
Hello,
   I need some help please.
I want to compile xen-3.1.0 for use on a server that doesn't have 
X11 or Xorg installed.  I would like to control the servers through 
SSH and Telnet (unless you have a suggestion for something better 
(more Secure)).  I wouldn't be using VNC or Console(Unless I have 
to).  I have made the kernels and now only need the tools to control 
xen.
   I have searched the internet and asked for help before(And seen 
others ask) but can't seem to find the Documentation or help I need 
to only compile the needed components.  If anyone could point me in 
the right direction I would appreciate it.    If I need to take this 
to a different list please let me know. 
Thank you
Shane
 
 
Do not use telnet. Spending all that work on security, then using 
telnet, is like picking a 37-character mixed case password and then 
taping it to your monitor because you can't remember it: it rather 
defeats the purpose. 
It may be possible to compile, then rip out the X installation over the 
objections of the Xen dependencies. Have you tried that? 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |