 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/check: check for headers and libraries in
| To: | Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/check: check for headers and libraries in EXTRA_INCLUDES and EXTRA_LIB |
| From: | Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:13:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:14:07 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bwoAaVXX3iLczq0iefSB9VGCU+LjOwnpNSbNhBoLf7A=; b=Cee2eGx/KmoUewnEJ4ds60KsDanAcQPqMbbJUWfZg711n8yYHTNZRhA6G7/3ARBShJ VxLv3dtoX2HyuIv24V7gYCrdE74VESszJSy/QVhsxYSRcbMIQY5LfbT+NQW04YwQLv+Y JNo0qKJC64OvVw1Dzr8AN/WRgCE0uZitQJv+8= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CAPLaKK71zs+0aPd2A6yM_+OPtEfMJZnK2KyHANFxFXgDjms8qQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <8fe2ca552de44aa679be.1318512275@loki> <20124.19527.706498.819017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAPLaKK6=nU4R62KvxK++XGNx0zff89TNYZkTFizZ1wDbMqUBNg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20125.32034.710835.32455@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAPLaKK71zs+0aPd2A6yM_+OPtEfMJZnK2KyHANFxFXgDjms8qQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>> Why do you move it ? > > Because if I found the requested headers in one of the folders while > doing the for loop I perform a return 0, I could also perform a break > and left the check_sys_root at the end, but does it really matter that > much to check_sys_root at the start or at the end of has_header? > Looking at the code of the function it doesn't seem to matter when it > is performed. > Also, I've forgot to say that has_lib function performs check_sys_root at the beginning. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/check: check for headers and libraries in EXTRA_INCLUDES and EXTRA_LIB, Roger Pau Monné |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26), Ian Campbell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/check: check for headers and libraries in EXTRA_INCLUDES and EXTRA_LIB, Roger Pau Monné |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/check: check for headers and libraries in EXTRA_INCLUDES and EXTRA_LIB, Ian Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
