|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size.
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Already the field offset comments are broken in a few places in unstable, so
> perhaps this is a better way to go.
it's an idea. A few years ago I wrote drivers for SCI and had a mixed
linux/alpha freebsd/pentium cluster. It's a little tricky to get everyone
happily addressing each other's memories across that boundary, but I did
it by making all struct fields unsigned long long and letting the
compilers do the right thing. I didn't use a single __attribute__
directive, but at the same time, these fairly different machines with
different OSes had shared memory. I still don't see why xen can not do the
same.
ron
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Kurt Garloff
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Jimi Xenidis
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Jimi Xenidis
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size.,
Ronald G. Minnich <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., David Hopwood
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., David Hopwood
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Hollis Blanchard
RE: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ian Pratt
|
|
|
|
|