| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)
> > Do you have a suggestion for an alternative? I know there
> are a number
> > of binding-generators but I thought Pyrex was the most widely used.
>
> Pyrex is probably the most generally used -- the stuff pygtk uses is
> nice, but not very general.
>
> In most cases, though, bindings done by hand end up being
> higher quality
> than something that's just being generated.
I've just looked at Pyrex and it doesn't look like a good soloution to
me. It doesn't seem to offer much over the current manual bindings in
Xc.
Has anyone any recent experience with SWIG?
Ian
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idh82&alloc_id148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home