Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeremy Katz wrote:

> Okay, I got Pyrex happier with gcc4 and sent that patch off this
> afternoon, so that's not an argument against it at this point.
>  
Awesome! Thanks!

I'm currently playing with SWIG.  I haven't really decided myself which 
method I like the most.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori

> I guess it's down to the aesthetics of binding generators, which since
> I'm not really a fan of any of them, I won't argue much about between
> the evils.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>  

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel