This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 11:25 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 09:55 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > gcc4 is still a bit off and I imagine that Pyrex will be updated as 
> > needed.  If it ever proves to be painful to deal with, I'll break down 
> > and add bindings by hand.  Does that seem like a reasonable plan moving 
> > forward?
> gcc4 isn't that far off.  It's in the Fedora development tree and we're
> using it to compile everything now.  See Rik's multiple patches to fix
> warnings that pop up with gcc4.  And counting on Pyrex being fixed based
> on the complete lack of response to questions on this topic may be
> wishful thinking.  Maybe I'll look at Pyrex a little this afternoon and
> see if I can figure out how to fix what it's doing.

Okay, I got Pyrex happier with gcc4 and sent that patch off this
afternoon, so that's not an argument against it at this point.

I guess it's down to the aesthetics of binding generators, which since
I'm not really a fan of any of them, I won't argue much about between
the evils.


This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>