Re: [Xen-devel] unstable binaries
Am Dienstag, den 15.03.2005, 20:16 +0100 schrieb Vincent Hanquez:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:47:20PM +0100, nils toedtmann wrote:
> > Ok, after lots of compiling, rebooting & testing, i got this picture:
> > The error "wget: retr.c:293: calc_rate: Assertion `msecs >= 0' failed."
> > is still present with xen-2.0-testing ("ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2005-03-04
> > 00:57:22"), but now i have to trigger them by higher load. I was not
> > able to reproduce it on a vanilla kernel with same config (besides
> > ARCH specific options).
> > <<<test_output>>>
> > nanosleep02 1 FAIL : Remaining sleep time 4010000 usec doesn't
> > match with the expected 3999236 usec time
> > nanosleep02 1 FAIL : child process exited abnormally
> > incrementing stop
> > <<<execution_status>>>
> > duration=1 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
> > cutime=0 cstime=0
> > <<<test_end>>>
Both problems still present on 22.214.171.124 & xen-2.0-testing(2005/03/14) as
> the failure is just a precision range problem. increasing the nanosleep
> USEC_PRECISION to 10 times more make the test suceed.
Same with me.
> Now running with HZ = 1000 make the precision problem disappear (at the
> expense of awakening the test 700ns too soon and still failing ..)
> Could you try running with HZ = 1000 to see if there are still problems
> with your programs ?
Did you mean this?
export HZ=1000; wget -c http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/...
It did not help. Still "Assertion `msecs >= 0' failed" after some
minutes of downloading at ~50kB/s.
> Also the strace output of the wget program failing might be handy to
> know if there's a link with nanosleep at least.
Is that ok or shall i strace with special options?
ps: firefox still behaves odd, too.
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
Xen-devel mailing list