This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] unstable binaries

To: "nils toedtmann" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robin Green" <greenrd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] unstable binaries
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 22:01:47 -0000
Cc: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:02:40 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcUjVuw2s8XSELczTJmZk+cRiMQ2YAACd1KQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] unstable binaries

> No. I ran the default testset (ltp-full-20050207) on xen0-2.0.4 and
> repeated the failed tests on different kernels (all 2.6.10): 
> 1.770_FC3 (fedora errata kernel), vanilla, xen0-2.0-testing (2.3.), 
> xen0-2.0-testing (4.3.). Except the FC3 kernel, they all had the same 
> config (except options not present due to ARCH). The test "fcntl23" 
> failed on all kernels, so it probably a fedora issue. The tests 
> "ioperm02", "iopl02" and "nanosleep02" failed on all xen-kernels,
> and only on them. This is the output for "nanosleep02":

The iopl02 and ioperm02 failures are expected, but not at all serious.
We actually have a plan to virtualize iopl just to tidy this up.

nanosleep2 is a surprise -- I can't recall seeing this fail before. I
wander if its an Athlon issue...


SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
Xen-devel mailing list